Welcome!

Welcome to Paradigm Exchange! Although I've already established the intention of my blog above, I believe a deeper explanation is warranted. I have created this blog in response to my relentless independent research on environmental issues and in response to the encouragement of my family and friends who have so willingly been my main audience to share my newest environmental concerns and research findings. It's time I stop dominating dinner conversations, phone calls, etc. and let them read about my findings on their own time as well as open the door to others who may be interested in reading about issues affecting our environment, health, and society. My intention is to present the facts and pragmatic solutions in a manner that's educational and interesting to a broad audience. With many sites and information misleading us with greenwashing, unnecessary propaganda, and/or "somewhat" green approaches, it's my hope to establish a clean venue for exchanging ideas and research. Please let me know if you find any information I post to be misleading and feel free to play devil's advocate with me. I chose the name Paradigm Exchange as a spin off of Thomas Kuhn's coined term "Paradigm shift", defined as a radical change in thinking from an accepted point of view to a new one, necessitated when new scientific discoveries produce anomalies in the current paradigm. I find this fitting in that we are amidst a "green" revolution, in the way we think and do. Science has shown us the devastating effects of our old ways of living. Once educated it is unacceptable to continue to live by the old format. Let us exchange the old paradigm for the new. Enjoy!

Thursday, August 28, 2008

Forest Ethics and Junk Mail

Today I dove deep into Forest Ethics. Forest Ethics is a nonprofit environmental organization with a mission to protect Endangered Forests. Their first step is to identify which forests are endangered (Great Bear, Inland Rainforest, Boreal, Chile, and Sierra Nevada). Next they determine which corporations are purchasing the products of that destruction. If a corporation refuses to change its practices, they hold that company publicly accountable with protests, websites, email campaigns, national advertisements, and more. When a company is ready to protect Endangered Forests, Forest Ethics help them implement sound policies through their Corporate Action Program. While logging companies may be able to tune out the protests of environmental groups, they can’t ignore their largest customers when they demand environmental reform.

One of Forest Ethics’ current campaigns is against the catalog industry with Sears (also Sears-owned Lands’ End) at the forefront of their campaign. Click here to download the full PDF report on Sears. According to Forest Ethics Sears is one of the largest catalog producers in the world and they’re the largest catalog company without responsible paper standards. Their catalogs have virtually no recycled content and use paper sourced from vital ecosystems and Endangered Forests, including the Canadian Boreal.

Less than 8% of Canada’s Boreal Forest is protected. It is being logged at a rate of 2 acres a minute, 24 hours a day. The United States consumes more than half of all the trees logged in the Boreal—many in the form of catalogs and junk mail. Clearcutting, mining, and oil and gas development have already devastated half of the Canadian Boreal and half of the historic range of the Boreal’s iconic woodland caribou. -Forest Ethics

Forest Ethics goes on to say “Many other catalog companies have already changed their ways. Victoria’s Secret and other industry leaders including Dell and Williams-Sonoma are making great progress, and the rest of the industry will have to follow suit to stay competitive.

Meanwhile, Forest Ethics is getting ready to launch their Do Not Mail campaign to stop junk mail. Check out the fact box from Forest Ethics where they show that greenhouse gases created each year by junk mail are the annual equivalent to 11 coal-fired power plants or 9,372,000 average passenger cars. (Doesn't mention if it's the whole worlds junk mail or the USA's junk mail)

It’s sickening to read these statistics. Its insulting and an amazing waste! Most of all a waste of our resources and energy, but also a waste of our time when we open the mail to figure out if it is indeed junk mail, throw it away, and try to get them to not send us the crap anymore. I can't imagine it’s an effective marketing approach using this tactic. Oh look, just read deeper…Forest Ethic's agrees that it's ineffective and shares it's findings: “A response rate of less than 0.25% is considered acceptable for the 500 million U.S. credit card solicitations that are mailed monthly.” Let’s do the math…0.25% of 500 million is…1,250,000 people that sign up. Let’s say it costs $0.01 to produce one mail ad, that’s $5,000,000…or $4.00 paid per new customer, interesting, seems like these companies could put that money to better advertising use but apparently not since I’m sure they’ve ran their return on investment...and really $4.00 isn't much to pay considering how much they can make with each new customer.

I signed up a month ago with a company to rid my mail of junk mail. So far I haven't noticed a difference but apparently it can take up to a few weeks/months to work. Here are websites I’ve found that appear to offer credible services:

Opt-Out Prescreen will allow you to opt out of receiving credit card and insurance offers. Call 1-888-567-8688 (888-5-OPT-OUT) from your home telephone, or visit their website at http://www.optoutprescreen.com.

http://www.donotmail.org/ (you can also sign a ‘Do Not Mail’ petition here)

http://www.greendimes.com/